Share

Abstract

Much of our understanding of linguistic structure was necessarily first built up on the basis of isolated sentences, either constructed by analysts or speakers consulting their intuitions, or from written documents. The availability of corpora of unscripted speech is now allowing us to see what speakers actually do, opening up vast new areas for exploration. Some of the advantages described here are the access to prosody and context. The question addressed is how closely traditional syntactic structures, particularly constituent structures, are matched by prosodic structures. Points are illustrated with corpus material from Mohawk, a language indigenous to the North American Northeast.

Intonation units

As is now generally recognized, speech is typically not produced in a continuous stream, but rather in spurts, termed variously intonation units, prosodic phrases, tone units, etc. Such units are generally identifiable by a convergence of cues. The cues used here are those set forth by Chafe in a series of works spanning the decades from the 1970’s through the first two decades of the 21st century, listed at the end of this paper. They fall into three main categories.

Figure 1.

1. Mohawk

Mohawk is a member of the Iroquoian family indigenous to northeastern North America. There are six main Mohawk communities. Material cited here comes from a conversation between speakers from Kahnawà:ke, Quebec, Mrs. Josephine Kaieríthon Horne (JH), and Mrs. Charlotte Kaherákwas Bush Provencher (CB). They were discussing a funeral procession they had watched the day before, when the body of a lacrosse player was taken to his father’s house for a traditional ceremony.

Mohawk is considered a prototypical example of a polysynthetic language. Words often contain many morphemes. It is holophrastic in a narrow sense: verbs can constitute complete sentences in themselves, with an obligatory pronominal prefix identifying the core arguments, a verb stem, and an aspect suffix.

Figure 2.

Morphological verbs can also function as referring expressions, and are often lexicalized as such.

Figure 3.

Such words, tightly grammaticalized and often lexicalized expressions, package together elements of one concept: an event or state, complete with given participants, as in (2) and (3), or a referent, as in (4). If a significant new referent is to be introduced, additional words are used.

The prosody of single words is not manipulable for information structuring. Though one Mohawk verb may correspond to a multi-word sentence in languages like English, individual morphemes cannot be given extra prosodic salience. Pitch and rhythm are determined purely mechanically: stress is basically penultimate, with pitch contours and vowel length based on syllable structure, as described in Section 2.

It is easy to see matches between larger syntactic structures and prosodic structure. Consider the sentence in (5).

Figure 4.

This sentence was bounded by pauses and showed a coherent pitch contour, with a high pitch reset at the beginning on thó ‘there’, then a relatively steady descent in pitch to a final, terminal fall, with a peaks on the stressed syllable iá: of the hearsay particle iá:ken and the stressed syllable tén of the verb iahonwaia’ténhawe’ ‘they took his body’. A pitch trace is in Figure 1.

Figure 5.Figure 1. Pitch trace of sentence bounded by pauses (5)

The intensity, shown in Figure 2, also shows a gradual fall to the end.

Figure 6.Figure 2. Intensity trace of sentence bounded by pauses (5)

It is important to note that the cues distinguishing intonation units are not categorical. Pitch, intensity, and rhythm all vary along continua. Pauses vary in length and may not even be present at all. The three sentences in (6) were spoken with essentially no pauses separating them. Mrs. Bush had just noted that the newspaper was forbidden from publishing a description of the service.

Figure 7.

Nevertheless, the distinct intonation units are easily identifiable from the pitch contour. Each began with a pitch reset on a stressed syllable. (Mrs. Bush, who made the second comment, generally spoke on a higher pitch than Mrs. Horne, who made the first and third comments.)

Figure 8.Figure 3. Three intonation units with pitch resets (6)

Basic intonation units usually show decreasing pitch, or declination, over successive stressed syllables. Mohawk stress is basically penultimate. (Epenthetic vowels are not counted.) Stressed syllables show several pitch contours. In closed stressed syllables, which are short, there is simply high pitch, as in ónhka’ ‘who’ in (6) above. In open stressed syllables, which are lengthened, the pitch rises through the duration of the syllable, as in taiakothohtá:ton ‘one did not allow it’. Both are represented by an acute accent in the standard orthography. Vowel length is represented by a colon <:>. Before a glottal stop (represented by an apostrophe <’> in the standard orthography), stressed syllables have a distinctive pitch contour, represented by a grave accent: an initial steep rise then abrupt fall to below the baseline pitch, with vowel length, as in nì:’i ‘myself, ourselves’. If the glottal stop would close the syllable, it disappears, but the pitch contour and length remain, as in kahiatonhserà:ke ‘in the paper’ (< kahiatonhserá’ke). If the stressed syllable is closed by h and the following syllable begins with a resonant (n, r, w, y, spelled <i>), the syllable carries the same pitch contour and length, and the h disappears: wakaterò:ron ‘I was watching’ (< wakateróhron). When a word with rising pitch on an open stressed syllable is followed by another word, the pitch often continues to rise into the following syllable: thaetiattó:kén’ nì:’i ‘we wouldn’t have noticed it ourselves’. (This continuing rise is not normally marked in the standard orthography.)

Declination over successive intonation units can be seen in the pitch trace in Figure 4. Stressed syllables are indicated with ▼.

Figure 9.Figure 4. Decreasing pitch over successive stressed syllables (6)

Intonation units thus appear to match syntactic sentences.

2. Types of intonation units.

Chafe distinguished three basic types of intonation units.

Figure 10.

Examples of each can be seen in the passage in (8). Each line represents a separate intonation unit. Punctuation here reflects pitch contours: comma for a non-terminal contour, period for a terminal contour, dash for truncation.

Figure 11.

The passage in (8) consists of a single syntactic sentence ‘They took him to his house and I guess he prayed according to their custom’. It was uttered in multiple intonation units, but there was an overall prosodic coherence, with a declination in pitch over the whole. Each successive intonation unit began with a small pitch reset rather than a full one, and the final unit ended in a terminal pitch contour.

Figure 12.Figure 5. Sub-units within sentential intonation unit (8)

In fact prosodic sentences consisting of multiple intonation units and ending in a final terminal contour are common. Example (9) was uttered in two intonation units, the first consisting of a conditional clause and the second the matrix clause.

Figure 13.

The pitch trace is in Figure 6, with an initial high pitch reset, then a smaller pitch reset at the beginning of the following main clause, declination over the whole, and a final terminal contour.

Figure 14.Figure 6. Conditional clause (9)

A similar intonational structure can be seen in a sentence with an adverbial clause in (10).

Figure 15.

This sentence began with an initial full pitch reset on the stressed syllable tá: of the matrix clause wahatikwatá:ko’ ‘they fixed it’, followed by a small pause and smaller pitch reset on the first stressed syllable ó: of ó:nen ‘while’ in the adverbial clause ‘while I was watching’. Following the frequent pattern, the rising pitch on the stressed syllable tá: continued into the following syllable kó’. The characteristic contour of a steep rise followed by a rapid plunge can be seen on the stressed syllable rò: in the last word wakaterò:ron ‘I was watching’.

Figure 16.Figure 7. Adverbial clause (10)

Similar patterns can be seen with complement clauses. The sentence in (11) contains a complement clause within a complement clause, each in a separate intonation unit.

Figure 17.

The sentence shows an overall coherent pitch contour with declination, small pauses and small pitch resets on each intonation unit within it.

Figure 18.Figure 8. Complement clauses (11)

A similar pattern can be seen with relative clauses. Sentence (11) above ended with a relative clause ‘that happened yesterday’, visible in the last unit on the pitch trace in Figure 8. The sentence in (12) ended with a relative clause ‘who came here’ modifying ‘children’.

Figure 19.

Here, too, the relative clause was uttered as a separate intonation unit within the overall prosodic sentence, set off by an initial pause and small pitch reset.

Figure 20.Figure 9. Relative clause (12)

Prosodic structures thus appear to match syntactic structures, with a separate intonation unit for each clause. Smaller constituents are also uttered in separate intonation units. In Figure (9) the bus was introduced in one intonation unit, followed by the verb ‘brought them’ in a second, and the children in a third. A similar pattern can be seen with the adverb ‘to his house’ in (13).

Figure 21.

The adverb ‘to his house’ began after a pause with an initial smaller pitch reset.

Figure 22.Figure 10. Adverb (13)

A more complex construction is in (14), with a matrix clause followed by a complement clause which contains an adverbial clause which itself contains another adverb.

Figure 23.

The declination over the whole sentence is clear, with smaller pitch resets on each intonation unit, in some cases separated by a pause. The stressed syllable ièn: of the verb tewakaterièn:tare’ ‘I don’t know’ in the first clause shows the distinctive sharp rise then fall in pitch characteristic of the falling tone (though the fall itself was not picked up in the pitch trace), as does the stressed syllable rì: of the verb nikarì:wes ‘so it was long’ in the second. The rising pitch on the stressed open syllable hón: in the verb ionshón:néwe’ ‘they returned’ was carried over into the following syllable . (The digraphs <en> and <on> represent single nasalized vowels in the standard orthography; hón: is an open syllable.)

Figure 24.Figure 11. Complex sentence (14)

On the basis of these examples, it appears that even elaborate syntactic constituent structure is perfectly reflected in prosodic structure.

3. Information packaging

Further examination reveals that prosodic structure does not actually always match syntactic structure. The sentence in (15) was pronounced as a single intonation unit, with no pauses or pitch resets, though it contains multiple constituents.

Figure 25.

Figure 26.Figure 12. Apparent subject and object (15)

The sentence in (16) contained an adverb in addition to the verb, but unlike the clause with an adverb in (13), it, too, was pronounced in a single intonation unit.

Figure 27.

Figure 28.Figure 13. Verb and adverb (16)

The sentence in (17) contained conjoined adverbial clauses.

Figure 29.

Even this complex sentence was pronounced as a single, simplex intonation unit.

Figure 30.Figure 14. Matrix with conjoined adverbial clauses (17)

The long sentence in (18), consisting of a conditional clause, a matrix clause, and a complement clause, was similarly pronounced as a single intonation unit.

Figure 31.

Figure 32.Figure 15. Conditional clause, matrix clause, complement (18)

The sentence in (19), consisting of a matrix clause and a complement clause with conditional clause, was also pronounced as a single intonation unit.

Figure 33.

Figure 34.Figure 16. Matrix and complement with conditional clause (19)

The patterns make sense given Chafe’s observations that intonation units generally represent one new idea at a time, a single focus of consciousness, be it an event, state, referent, or something else. He distinguished three main types of ideas.

a) given (active in consciousness, generally because they are currently under discussion

or otherwise present)

b) accessible (semi-active in consciousness, either part of previous discussion

or related to something or someone under discussion)

c) new (inactive in consciousness).

A single intonation unit may include one or more given ideas (a) and/or accessible ideas (b), but no more than one new substantive idea (c). The prosodic phrasing seen in the previous examples becomes understandable once we examine the contexts in which they were uttered, now easily accessible with spoken language corpora.

The sentence in (15) ‘Maybe some of them were riding in another car’, with both a verb and separate core arguments, occurred in the context seen in (20). (The full conversation was in Mohawk, but just the free translations are given here for context.)

Figure 35.

As can be seen, the children were already part of the ongoing discussion, mentioned in the three immediately preceding comments. Riding in another vehicle was accessible from the mention of the children being brought in in a bus.

The sentence in (16) earlier, ‘I got a bit cold in the morning,’ with verb and adverb in the same intonation unit, occurred in the context in (21).

Figure 36.

The cooler weather was already under discussion. The final sentence in (21) above was followed by the longer sentence in (22) below (seen earlier in (17)), containing a matrix clause followed by conjoined adverbial clauses, ‘It’s more pleasant too now that the sun is out and it’s not quite warm.’, all pronounced as a single intonation unit. It continued the discussion of the cooler weather.

Figure 37.

The sentence seen earlier in (18) ‘If I’d been home I wouldn’t have noticed what happened, occurred in the context in (23).

Figure 38.

The possibility of not noticing had just been mentioned. The new contribution was ‘If I had been home’.

The sentence seen earlier in (19), ‘It’s true you wouldn’t have noticed if you were home’ immediately followed.

Figure 39.

In all of these passages, each intonation unit represents just one significant new idea.

4. Information structure

Much can be learned about grammatical structure from the written word, but some things can be missed. The sentence in (25) appears to consist simply of a subject and predicate.

Figure 40.

It is immediately clear from the prosody, however, that it has quite a different structure.

Figure 41.Figure 22. Topic shift (25)

The construction shows a distinctive, recognizable prosodic pattern, with an initial referential expression ‘these White people’, followed by a pause then a full pitch reset on the following nuclear clause ‘they were following weren’t they’. It is a topicalization construction, signaling a shift in topic to ‘these White people’. The preceding context was seen earlier in (8), ‘His father prayed in the way they do in their tradition, according to their custom’.

The same construction topic shift construction can be seen in (26). When just seen in print, it would appear to consist of two simple sentences.

Figure 42.

The prosody shows a different structure.

Figure 43.Figure 23. Topic shift (26)

The sentence began with a full pitch reset, then continued with a pause and another full pitch reset on the following clause. The characteristic steep rise then sharp fall of the tone marked with a grave accent can be seen on the verb aontaiakoiakèn:’en. In addition, there was no terminal fall before the last intonation unit, which did not itself begin with a pitch reset. As the speakers later made clear, this last intonation unit was part of the same sentence, a reason clause, though there was no overt marker of its dependent status.

Figure 44.

Similarly, in print the sentence in (28) appears to be a simple question.

Figure 45.

The prosody shows a different structure. It is a focus construction. It began with an extra high pitch on the initial focused element (‘that one’), immediately followed by the remainder of the clause, with no pause or pitch reset. The pitch pattern can be seen in the last intonation unit in Figure 24, along with that of the preceding context.

Figure 46.Figure 24. Focus construction (29)

Figure 47.

In print (30) appears to be a simple sentence, with what appears to be a subject, ‘his father’, at the end.

Figure 48.

This sentence, too, was pronounced with a distinctive prosodic pattern. It consisted of three intonation units. But the last showed no pitch reset. It was pronounced with a low, flat pitch contour.

Figure 49.

The pitch contour can be seen in Figure 25.

Figure 50.Figure 25. Antitopic construction (31)

This is an antitopic construction. The final nominal, here ‘his father’, serves to confirm the identity of an ongoing topic, a given or accessible participant, especially when multiple participants are in play. These speakers had been discussing the procession leading to the father’s house, where the father was going to pray in the traditional way.

5. Conclusion

Both syntax and prosody are structured. They often work in concert, but not always. Syntactic structure is more categorical than prosodic structure. Words are in one order or another; markers of subordination and other relations are present or absent. Prosody, by contrast, involves continua of pitch, intensity, and timing.

The two show different degrees of crystallization. Morphological structure is highly crystallized: in Mohawk, morphemes are strictly ordered, and word-level prosody is completely determined by phonological structure: stress occurs basically on the penultimate syllable, and pitch and rhythm depend on the syllable structure.

Syntactic structure is still conventionalized, but slightly less so than morphology. In Mohawk, basic constituent order reflects information structure, with more newsworthy information appearing early in the clause, followed by successively less important and peripheral information. In complement constructions, however, matrix clauses precede their complements, and various kinds of subordinate clauses are usually, though not always, identified by overt markers. Prosodic sentences, ending in a full terminal contour, usually, though again not always, match syntactic sentences.

Information structure in the narrower sense is signaled by both constituent order and conventionalized prosodic structure. Topic shift constructions consist of an initial constituent identifying the topic, pronounced with a full pitch reset, followed by a pause then the nuclear clause, which also begins with a full pitch reset. Focus constructions consist of an initial constituent identifying the focus, pronounced with an extra-high pitch reset, followed immediately by the nuclear clause with not pause or pitch reset. Antitopic constructions, which reiterate the identity of topic already under discussion, consist of a clause followed by a constituent identifying the topic, with no pitch reset and generally a flat pitch, often slower speed, and sometimes creaky voice.

Finally, information packaging in the wider sense (including managing the flow of information beyond considerations of topic and focus) is accomplished with prosodic structure. Intonation units present one new idea at a time. Intonational sentences, which may consist of multiple intonation units showing declination over the whole and ending in a final terminal contour, generally present a single event or state. Intonation units may correspond to syntactic constituents, but not necessarily.

In the end, prosody can tell us things syntax does not, often more directly reflecting the knowledge state of the speaker and what the speaker assumes to be the knowledge state of the hearer.

References

  1. Chafe Wallace. The Flow of Thought and the Flow of Language. In: T. Givón. Discourse and Syntax. Academic Press: Academic Press; 1979:159-181.
  2. Chafe Wallace. Integration and Involvement in Spoken and Written Language. In: Tasso Borbe. Semiotics Unfolding. Mouton: Mouton; 1984:1095-1102.
  3. Chafe Wallace. Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow. In: Russell Tomlin. Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. John Benjamins: John Benjamins; 1987:21-51.
  4. Chafe Wallace. Linking Intonation Units in Spoken English. In: John Haiman, Sandra A. Thompson. Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. John Benjamins: John Benjamins; 1988:1-27.
  5. Chafe Wallace. Information Flow. In: William Bright. Oxford International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford; 1992:215-218.
  6. Chafe Wallace. Intonation Units and Prominences in English Natural Discourse. Proceedings of the IRCS Workshop on Prosody in Natural Speech. University of Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania; 1992:41-52.
  7. Chafe Wallace. Prosodic and Functional Units of Language. In: Jane A. Edwards, Martin D. Lampert. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Lawrence Erlbaum: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993:33-43.
  8. Chafe Wallace. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago; 1994.
  9. Chafe Wallace. How Consciousness Shapes Language. Pragmatics & Cognition. 1996; 4:35-54.
  10. Chafe Wallace. Language and the Flow of Thought. In: Michael Tomasello. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Lawrence Erlbaum: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998:93-111.
  11. Chafe Wallace. Verbs and their Objects and the One New Idea Hypothesis. In: Alan K. Melby, Arle R. Lommel. LACUS Forum XXVI. The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States; 2000:5-18.
  12. Chafe Wallace. The Analysis of Discourse Flow. In: Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell: Blackwell; 2001:673-687.
  13. Discourse Studies, Volume 1. Sage: London.
  14. Chafe Wallace. Prosody: The Music of Language. In: Carol Genetti. How Languages Work: An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press; 2014:220-239.
  15. Chafe Wallace. Thought-Based Linguistics: How Languages Turn Thoughts into Sounds. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 2018.